Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Vogelstein v. National Screen Service Corp.
310 F.2d 738
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1962-12-20
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. Upon review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court, 204 F.Supp. 591, will be affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Vogelstein v. National Screen Service Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
VOGELSTEIN v. NATIONAL SCREEN SERVICE CORP.,310 F.2d 738(3rd Cir. 1962)
Harry VOGELSTEIN, Trading as Baltimore Poster Company, Appellant, v.
NATIONAL SCREEN SERVICE CORPORATION, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. (Formerly
Loew's Incorporated). TCF Film Corporation (Formerly Twentieth Century-Fox
Film Corporation). United Artists Corporation, Paramount Film Distributing
Corporation and Universal Film Exchanges, Inc.
No. 14056.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued December 11, 1962.
Decided December 20, 1962.
Louis J. Goffman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Wolf, Block, Schorr Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp., appellee.
W. Bradley Ward, Philadelphia, Pa. (Schnader, Harrison, Segal Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., Edward W. Mullinix, Shirley S. Bitterman, on the brief), for Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. (formerly Loew's Inc.), TCF Film Corp. (formerly Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.), United Artists Corp., Paramount FilmPage 739Distributing Corp. and Universal Film Exchanges, Inc., appellees.
Walter S. Beck, New York City (Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim Ballon, New York City, Louis Nizer, New York City, on the brief), for National Screen Service Corp., appellee.
Before KALODNER and FORMAN, Circuit Judges, and ROSENBERG, District Judge.
The Order of the District Court,204 F. Supp. 591, will be affirmed.