Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

In re Texaco, Inc.

In re Texaco, Inc., 309 F.2d 739 (2d Cir. 1962)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1962-10-25
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Appellant City of New York, the owner and operator of the ferryboat Tompkins-ville, appeals from two decrees in the admiralty entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. After the Tompkinsville had been involved in a nighttime collision in Upper New York Bay with a light oil barge, the Texaco 396, owned and operated by Texaco, Inc., the City and Texaco, Inc. filed separate petitions seeking limitation of or exoneration from liability for any loss suffered by others occasioned by the collision. Minor damage to both vessels had been incurred and several ferryboat passengers had filed claims for compensation for personal injuries. In their respective petitions each petitioner charged that the collision was caused solely by the acts and defaults of the other.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Texaco, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
PETITION OF TEXACO, INC.,309 F.2d 739(2nd Cir. 1962)
PETITION OF TEXACO, INC., formerly the Texas Company, as owner of the TUG,
ALL AMERICAN, in a cause of exoneration from and limitation of liability,
Appellee. Petition of The CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, as owner of the
FERRYBOAT TOMPKINSVILLE for a limitation of or exoneration from liability,
Rose Bernstein et al., Claimants-Cross-Appellants-Appellee.
Nos. 38, 88, Dockets 27204, 27217.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued October 16, 1962.
Decided October 25, 1962.
Action in admiralty, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Edmund L. Palmieri, J.

City of New York appeals from two decrees adverse to it, the first holding it solely at fault for damages and injuries caused by a collision between its ferryboat TOMPKINSVILLE and a barge, TEXACO 396, of Texaco, Inc., the second holding that Texaco, Inc. was fully exonerated from any blame for the collision. The decrees are affirmed.
Brush Brush, New York City, for appellee.Page 740

Leo A. Larkin, Corp. Counsel of City of New York, for petitioner-appellant.

Kane, Grae Agar, St. George, S.I., N.Y. (Solomon R. Agar, St. George, S.I.N.Y., of counsel), for claimants-cross-appellants-appellees.
Before WATERMAN, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant City of New York, the owner and operator of the ferryboat TOMPKINSVILLE, appeals from two decrees in the admiralty entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. After the TOMPKINSVILLE had been involved in a nighttime collision in Upper New York Bay with a light oil barge, the TEXACO 396, owned and operated by Texaco, Inc., the City and Texaco, Inc. filed separate petitions seeking limitation of or exoneration from liability for any loss suffered by others occasioned by the collision. Minor damage to both vessels had been incurred and several ferryboat passengers had filed claims for compensation for personal injuries.

In their respective petitions each petitioner charged that the collision was caused solely by the acts and defaults of the other. The petitions were the subject of a lengthy consolidated hearing on the merits, in which counsel for the personal injury passenger claimants took part, seeking recovery for the injured against either or both of the petitioners.

On June 29, 1961, the trial judge filed an extensive opinion, D.C.,210 F. Supp. 390, containing detailed findings of fact. He concluded that the TOMPKINSVILLE was solely responsible for the collision and that the City of New York was neither entitled to exoneration nor to a limitation of its liability; that Texaco, Inc. was entitled to exoneration and to a decree against the City for the damages sustained by the barge TEXACO 396; and that the claims of the injured passengers against the City should be sustained and the claims of the passengers against Texaco, Inc. should be dismissed.

Pursuant to his opinion and to these conclusions the trial judge later filed the decrees appealed from, an interlocutory decree against the City upon its petition and a final decree in favor of Texaco, Inc. upon the latter's petition.

Admitting the fault of the TOMPKINSVILLE and conceding that it is not entitled to limit its liability, the City appeals on the ground that the factual findings found by the trial judge demonstrate that Texaco, Inc. should not have been absolved of fault and that damages should be apportioned between the City and Texaco.

We find no merit to the City's position and affirm on the June 29, 1961 opinion of the trial judge.Page 741