Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

James R. Hoffa and Robert E. McCarthy Jr. v. United States

309 F.2d 680

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1962-07-12
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. It appearing that this appeal is from orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida granting motions by the Government to quash subpoenas duces tecum and ad tes-tificandum, and it appearing that such orders are not “final decisions” within the contemplation of Title 28 U.S.Code § 1291, IT IS NOW ORDERED that the motion of the United States to dismiss the within appeal is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND ALTERNATIVELY, A MOTION TO STAY ISSUANCE OF MANDATE The petition for rehearing is hereby denied. The alternative motion for a stay of the issuance of the mandate is also denied.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed James R. Hoffa and Robert E. McCarthy Jr. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
10 opinions
HOFFA v. UNITED STATES,309 F.2d 680(5th Cir. 1962)
James R. HOFFA and Robert E. McCarthy, Jr., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES
of America, Appellee.
No. 19581.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 1, 1962.
Rehearing Denied July 12, 1962.
Charles E. Davis, Orlando, Fla., O.B. Cline, Jr., Miami, Fla., for appellants.

James T. Dowd, Marie L. McCann, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
It appearing that this appeal is from orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida granting motions by the Government to quash subpoenas duces tecum and ad testificandum, and it appearing that such orders are not "final decisions" within the contemplation of Title 28 U.S. Code § 1291,

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the motion of the United States to dismiss the within appeal is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND ALTERNATIVELY, A MOTION TO STAY ISSUANCE OF MANDATE

The petition for rehearing is hereby denied.

The alternative motion for a stay of the issuance of the mandate is also denied.Page 681Page 688