Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Boire v. Greyhound Corp.

Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 309 F.2d 397 (5th Cir. 1962)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1962-11-21
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The questions in this important case were carefully considered by the district *398court and discussed by the judge to whom the case was assigned. Greyhound Corporation v. Boire, D.C., 205 F.Supp. 686. We find ourselves in agreement with the principles there stated and the decision there reached.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Boire v. Greyhound Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
BOIRE v. GREYHOUND CORPORATION,309 F.2d 397(5th Cir. 1962)
Harold A. BOIRE, Regional Director, Twelfth Region, National Labor
Relations Board, Appellant, v. The GREYHOUND CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 19755.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 21, 1962.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Joseph P. Lieb, Judge.
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, James C. Paras, Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for appellant.

Warren E. Hall, Jr., Chesterfield H. Smith, Wofford H. Stidham, Bartow, Fla., for appellee.

Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Alexander E. Wilson, III, Atlanta, Ga. (Wilson, Branch Barwick, Atlanta, Ga., of counsel) as amicus curiae and on behalf of Floors, Inc.

I.J. Gromfine, Washington, D.C. (Zimring, Gromfine Sternstein, Washington, D.C., of counsel) as amicus curiae, and on behalf of Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, AFL-CIO.
Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and CARSWELL, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The questions in this important case were carefully considered by the districtPage 398court and discussed by the judge to whom the case was assigned. Greyhound Corporation v. Boire, D.C.,205 F. Supp. 686. We find ourselves in agreement with the principles there stated and the decision there reached. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.