Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Reading Co. v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.

295 F.2d 40

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1961-10-25
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Upon review of the record we find no error. The Interlocutory Decree of the District Court of March 30, 1961, 192 F. Supp. 663, will be affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Reading Co. v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

READING COMPANY v. POPE TALBOT, INC.,295 F.2d 40(3rd Cir. 1961)

READING COMPANY, Appellant v. POPE TALBOT, INC. and Merritt-Chapman

Scott Corporation.

No. 13603.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued October 17, 1961.

Decided October 25, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; C. William Kraft, Jr., Judge.

Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia, Pa. (Rawle Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., Thomas F. Mount, J. Welles Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Elmer C. Maddy, New York City (Krusen, Evans Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., and Kirlin, Campbell Keating, Roy C. Megargel, New York City, Claus G.U. Claesson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee Pope Talbot, Inc.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record we find no error.

The Interlocutory Decree of the District Court of March 30, 1961,192 F. Supp. 663, will be affirmed.Page 41