Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Wymard v. McCloskey & Co.

292 F.2d 839

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1961-07-18
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Wood, D.C.1960, 190 F.Supp. 420.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wymard v. McCloskey & Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

WYMARD v. McCLOSKEY CO.,292 F.2d 839(3rd Cir. 1961)

N.L. WYMARD and George L. Stark, Receivers of Kemmel Co., Inc. v.

McCLOSKEY CO., Inc., Appellant.

No. 13528.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued June 8, 1961.

Decided July 18, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Harold K. Wood, Judge.

J. Dress Pannell, Harrisburg, Pa. (Lawrence D. Biele, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Edward Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa. (Everett Bruce Dennis, Dennis, Lichtenstein,Page 840Cohen Dennis, Philadelphia, Pa., Goff Rubin, on the brief), Thomas J. Mullaney, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Wood, D.C. 1960,190 F. Supp. 420.