Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Roderick

United States v. Roderick, 290 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1961)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1961-06-16
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The judgment is reversed with directions to enter judgment for the defendant. See Knetsch v. United States, 1960, 364 U.S. 361, 81 S.Ct. 132, 5 L.Ed.2d 128; Weller v. C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Roderick. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
27 opinions
UNITED STATES v. RODERICK,290 F.2d 823(5th Cir. 1961)
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Dorrance D. RODERICK and wife,
Olga B. Roderick, Appellees.
No. 18211.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 16, 1961.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; R.E. Thomason, Judge.
John B. Jones, 1st Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Washington, D.C., Russell B. Wine, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., John B. Jones, Jr., Harry Baum, Gilbert E. Andrews, Jr., Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Lawrence L. Fuller, Asst. U.S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., for appellant.

James S. Moore, R.H. Feuille, El Paso, Tex., Scott, Hulse, Marshall Feuille, El Paso, Tex., for appellees.
Before HUTCHESON, RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is reversed with directions to enter judgment for the defendant. See Knetsch v. United States, 1960,364 U.S. 361,81 S.Ct. 132,5 L.Ed.2d 128; Weller v. C.I.R., 3 Cir., 1959,270 F.2d 294.
Reversed with directions.Page 824
Page 862