Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Mary T. Milhizer v. Riddle Airlines, a Foreign Corporation
289 F.2d 933
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1961-05-05
- Topic
- general
ORDER. This cause came on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, and the court being fully advised, and it appearing to the court that the opinion of the district judge fully and adequately discusses the matter for decision, and this court being 'in agreement with the conclusions of the district court, Now, therefore, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the district court, 185 F.Supp. 110, be, and it is, hereby affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mary T. Milhizer v. Riddle Airlines, a Foreign Corporation. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
MILHIZER v. RIDDLE AIRLINES,289 F.2d 933(6th Cir. 1961)
Mary T. MILHIZER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RIDDLE AIRLINES, a Foreign
Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14389.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 5, 1961.
John R. Secrest, Detroit, Mich., Carl F. Davidson, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for appellee.
Before MILLER, Chief Judge, SIMONS, Senior Judge, and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.
This cause came on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, and the court being fully advised, and it appearing to the court that the opinion of the district judge fully and adequately discusses the matter for decision, and this court being in agreement with the conclusions of the district court,
Now, therefore, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the district court,185 F. Supp. 110, be, and it is, hereby affirmed.Page 934