Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Largie Thomas Ayscue

United States v. Largie Thomas Ayscue, 287 F.2d 887 (4th Cir. 1961)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1961-03-30
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Denial of this motion to vacate a sentence as illegally imposed is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of the District Judge, where the facts are fully set forth. United States v. Ayscue, D.C. E.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Largie Thomas Ayscue. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

UNITED STATES v. AYSCUE,287 F.2d 887(4th Cir. 1961)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Largie Thomas AYSCUE, Appellant.

No. 8251.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 28, 1961.

Decided March 30, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville; Algernon L. Butler, Judge.

Russell Alton Wright, Richmond, Va., (Court-assigned counsel), for appellant.

Harold T. Dodge, Asst. U.S. Atty., Burlington, N.C., (Julian T. Gaskill, U.S. Atty., Raleigh, N.C., and Rossie G. Gardner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Winston-Salem, N.C., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOPER and HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judges, and LEWIS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Denial of this motion to vacate a sentence as illegally imposed is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of the District Judge, where the facts are fully set forth. United States v. Ayscue, D.C.E.D.N.C.187 F. Supp. 946. See, also, Gardner v. United States, 5 Cir.,274 F.2d 380.

Affirmed.Page 888Page 139