Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Bell v. Gray

Bell v. Gray, 287 F.2d 410 (6th Cir. 1960)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1960-12-19
Topic: general

ORDER. The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised: Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court, 191 F.Supp. 328, be affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Swin-ford.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bell v. Gray. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

BELL v. GRAY,287 F.2d 410(6th Cir. 1960)

Margaret BELL and Estate of Lucille Nestley, Deceased, By Edward J.

Nestley, Administrator, Appellants, v. William GRAY, District Director of

Internal Revenue and Seldon R. Glenn, Former Collector of Internal

Revenue, Appellees.

No. 14186.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

December 19, 1960.

Sol Goodman, Cincinnati, Ohio, Goodman Goodman, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief, for appellants.

Louise Foster, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and Meyer Rothwacks, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. and Jean L. Auxier, U.S. Atty., Lexington, Ky., on brief, for appellees.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court,191 F. Supp. 328, be affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Swinford.Page 411Page 500