Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Melvin C. Perkins v. Preston M. Banster and W. A. Ard

285 F.2d 426

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1960-11-28
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. After hearing plaintiff’s appeal from an order dismissing the proceedings as frivolous, we affirm for the same reason and refer for details to the opinion of the District Court, 190 F.Supp. 98 (Md., 1960). Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Melvin C. Perkins v. Preston M. Banster and W. A. Ard. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 10 opinions

PERKINS v. BANSTER,285 F.2d 426(4th Cir. 1960)

Melvin C. PERKINS, Appellant, v. Preston M. BANSTER and W.T. Ard,

Appellees.

No. 8228.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued November 21, 1960.

Decided November 28, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; Roszel C. Thomsen, Judge.

Melvin C. Perkins, pro se.

Leon H.A. Pierson, U.S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., and Robert E. Cahill, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., on brief, for appellees.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After hearing plaintiff's appeal from an order dismissing the proceedings as frivolous, we affirm for the same reason and refer for details to the opinion of the District Court,190 F. Supp. 98(Md., 1960).

Affirmed.Page 427

Page 528