Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.

Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc., 283 F.2d 695 (9th Cir. 1960)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1960-11-21
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed in the case by the learned District Judge, and reported at D.C., 166 F.Supp. 250.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 5 opinions

SARKES TARZIAN, INC. v. AUDIO DEVICES, INC.,283 F.2d 695(9th Cir. 1960)

SARKES TARZIAN, INC., a Corporation, Appellant, v. AUDIO DEVICES, INC., a

Corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 16431.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 21, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.

C.B. Dutton, Carl D. Overman, Indianapolis, Ind., Jacob Swartz, Los Angeles, Cal. (Dutton Kappes, Indianapolis, Ind., Dryden, Harrington, Horgan Swartz, Los Angeles, Cal., Mason, Kolehmainen Rathburn Wyss, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Richards, Watson, Birnbaum Smith, Clifford A. Hemmerling, Los Angeles, Cal. (Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Barrows Taylor, Thomas F. Reddy, Jr., Fritz L. Schweitzer, Jr., James G. Foley, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.

Before STEPHENS, BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed in the case by the learned District Judge, and reported at D.C.,166 F. Supp. 250.Page 696