Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Lawrence E. Connelly v. George W. Balkwill

Lawrence E. Connelly v. George W. Balkwill, 279 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1960)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1960-04-14
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised, *686 Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge McNamee granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment, reported in Connelly v. Balkwill, 174 F.Supp. 49.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lawrence E. Connelly v. George W. Balkwill. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 8 opinions

CONNELLY v. BALKWILL,279 F.2d 685(6th Cir. 1960)

Lawrence E. CONNELLY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George W. BALKWILL

et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13981.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 14, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Cleveland; Charles J. McNamee, Judge.

Harold K. Bell, and Robert E. Williamson, Lakewood, Ohio, for appellants.

Everett D. McCurdy and Lincoln Reavis of Spieth, Bell McCurdy, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief.

Charles D. Johnson, of Baker, Hoststler Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellees.

William B. Brooks, in pro. per., Chicago, Ill., E.S. Cummings, Jr. of Cummings Wyman, Chicago, Ill., on the brief.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and CECIL and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,Page 686

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge McNamee granting Appellees' motion for summary judgment, reported in Connelly v. Balkwill,174 F. Supp. 49.