Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Speciner v. Reynolds Metals Co.

279 F.2d 337

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1960-06-09
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. We affirm the judgment below on Judge Dimock’s thorough analysis of the facts and his discussion of the relevant principles and authorities set forth in his opinion reported at 177 F.Supp. 291 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1959). An examination of the exhibits fully supports Judge Dimock’s finding that all of the features of the plaintiff’s aluminum casement window which the defendant is alleged to have appro*338priated, were readily apparent from a casual inspection of the plaintiff’s window which was available on the open market. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Speciner v. Reynolds Metals Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions