Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Dorothy C. Geraghty v. Jean L. Heigle and Francis C. Heigle

Dorothy C. Geraghty v. Jean L. Heigle & Francis C. Heigle, 272 F.2d 509 (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1959)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1959-10-29
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Appellant (plaintiff) filed suit against appellees (defendants) and certain other persons for personal injuries growing out of a fall on stairs in a building where she was a roomer. 1 We find no error affecting substantial rights. Affirmed. 1 . The suit in tbe District Court is proceeding against the other defendants named therein. ,

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dorothy C. Geraghty v. Jean L. Heigle and Francis C. Heigle. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
GERAGHTY v. HEIGLE,272 F.2d 509(D.C. Cir. 1959)
Dorothy C. GERAGHTY, Appellant, v. Jean L. HEIGLE and Francis C. Heigle,
Appellees.
No. 15245.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued October 16, 1959.
Decided October 29, 1959.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; John J. Sirica, Judge.
Mr. Milton Heller, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Richard W. Galiher, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. William E. Stewart, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellees.
Before PRETTYMAN, Chief Judge, and WASHINGTON and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant (plaintiff) filed suit against appellees (defendants) and certain other persons for personal injuries growing out of a fall on stairs in a building where she was a roomer.1

We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.Page 510
  1. The suit in the District Court is proceeding against the other defendants named therein. ↩