Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Edward O. Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Incorporated, and William R. Schmitz
271 F.2d 591
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1959-11-12
- Topic
- capital-markets-and-corporate-governance
PER CURIAM. The petition to vacate our order of August 28, 1959, is denied by the court sitting en bcmc. Upon reconsideration we find that the application for leave to appeal was timely inasmuch as it was made to us within 10 days of the order of the district judge that contained the 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) statement. Because in our judgment the grant of leave to appeal will not fulfill the purpose expressed in the statute, we, in our discretion, adhere to our previous decision denying leave to appeal.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Edward O. Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Incorporated, and William R. Schmitz. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 13 opinions
MUELLER v. RAYON CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED,271 F.2d 591(2nd Cir. 1959)
Edward O. MUELLER, Plaintiff, v. RAYON CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED, and
William R. Schmitz, Defendants.
No. 25753.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Petition for Rehearing en Banc Filed September 10, 1959.
Decided November 12, 1959.
Reid Priest, New York City (Ralph M. McDermid, New York City, of counsel), for defendants.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD, WATERMAN, MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.