Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Rogers v. Schering Corp.

271 F.2d 266

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1959-11-05
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. We have examined the lengthy record in this case and have weighed the arguments of the respective parties. We can perceive no error in the decision of the court below and we are of the view that we can add nothing of value to the succinct and careful opinion of Judge Forman. D.C.D.N.J.1958, 165 F.Supp. 295. Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed on his opinion.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rogers v. Schering Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
ROGERS v. SCHERING CORPORATION,271 F.2d 266(3rd Cir. 1959)
William P. ROGERS, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to
the Alien Property Custodian v. SCHERING CORPORATION, a corporation of the
State of New Jersey, Appellant Hexagon Laboratories, Inc., a corporation
of the State of New York, Intervenor.
No. 12816.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued October 9, 1959.
Decided November 5, 1959.
Appeal from United States District Court for District of New Jersey; Phillip Forman, Judge.

See also 3 Cir.,262 F.2d 180.
William D. Denson, New York City (Anthony T. Augelli, of Milton McNulty Augelli, Jersey City, N.J., Irving H. Jurow, Bloomfield, N.J., George B. Finnegan, Jr., of Morgan, Finnegan, Durham Pine, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Montrose H. Massler, New York City (Allan L. Tumarkin, Newark, N.J., Theodore R. Kupferman, New York City, on the brief), for intervenor-appellee.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We have examined the lengthy record in this case and have weighed the arguments of the respective parties. We can perceive no error in the decision of the court below and we are of the view that we can add nothing of value to the succinct and careful opinion of Judge Forman. D.C.D.N.J. 1958,165 F. Supp. 295. Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed on his opinion.