Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Karkus v. Siefert

263 F.2d 333

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1958-12-24
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Upon review of the record we find no error. The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed upon the opinion of Chief Judge Forman, D.C.N.J., 169 F.Supp. 662.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Karkus v. Siefert. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

KARKUS v. SIEFERT,263 F.2d 333(3rd Cir. 1958)

Ezra W. KARKUS, Receiver in Bankruptcy of Vreeland L. Siefert, Bankrupt,

v. Vreeland L. SIEFERT, Myrtle A. Siefert, John F.X. Greene, Sudler

Construction Co., a corporation, Seymour Paskow, Wilmore Co., a

corporation, Appellant.

No. 12671.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued December 4, 1958.

Decided December 24, 1958.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Phillip Forman, Judge.

James E. Masterson, Newark, N.J. (Kleinberg, Moroney Masterson, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellant Paskow.

Isaac Gross, Red Bank, N.J. (Gross Garfield, Red Bank, N.J., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record we find no error.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed upon the opinion of Chief Judge Forman, D.C.N.J.,169 F. Supp. 662.Page 334