Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

United States of America Ex Rel. Roy Joseph Fells v. Charles Garfinkel

251 F.2d 846

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1958-01-15
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal by the relator, an alien who has been ordered to be deported, from an order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner’s contentions are stated and correctly decided in the opinion filed in the district court by Judge Sorg, 158 F.Supp. 524, with which we are in full accord and to which we need add nothing. The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States of America Ex Rel. Roy Joseph Fells v. Charles Garfinkel. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
UNITED STATES v. GARFINKEL,251 F.2d 846(3rd Cir. 1958)
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Roy Joseph FELLS, Appellant, v. Charles
GARFINKEL.
No. 12328.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued January 9, 1958.
Decided January 15, 1958.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Herbert P. Sorg, Judge.
Robert S. Grigsby, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

W. Wendell Stanton, Asst. U.S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa. (D. Malcolm Anderson, U.S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the relator, an alien who has been ordered to be deported, from an order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner's contentions are stated and correctly decided in the opinion filed in the district court by Judge Sorg,158 F. Supp. 524, with which we are in full accord and to which we need add nothing.

The order of the district court will be affirmed.