Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Thomas E. Briscoe v. United States

Thomas E. Briscoe v. United States, 251 F.2d 386 (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1958)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1958-01-13
Topic
bankruptcy

PER CURIAM. Appellant moves for reversal on the record. The Government objects on the merits, but not to the propriety of a final disposition. The complete record, which is now before us, clearly demonstrates that, at the sentencing hearing, the District Court erred in refusing to entertain appellant’s oral motion to withdraw his plea of guilty and enter a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity. Poole v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Thomas E. Briscoe v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
PER CURIAM.

Appellant moves for reversal on the record. The Government objects on the merits, but not to the propriety of a final disposition.

The complete record, which is now before us, clearly demonstrates that, at the sentencing hearing, the District Court erred in refusing to entertain appellant’s oral motion to withdraw his plea of guilty and enter a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity. Poole v. United States, 1957, 102 U.S.App.D.C.-, 250 F.2d 396; Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(d), 47, 18 U.S.C.A. Moreover, the record also discloses ample basis for trial upon that issue. Statement of Judge Bazelon upon order granting leave to appeal in Briscoe v. United States, 1957, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 318, 248 F.2d 640. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to allow appellant to withdraw the plea of guilty and enter a plea of not guilty.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge, dissents.