Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

LOUISIANA OIL REFINING CORPORATION v. TRIPLETT, 25 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1928)

La. OIL Refin. Corp., Plaintiff in Error, v. Delphia E.TRIPLETT., 25 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1928)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1928-03-19
Topic: general

LOUISIANA OIL REFINING CORPORATION v. TRIPLETT, 25 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1928) LOUISIANA OIL REFINING CORPORATION, Plaintiff in Error, v. Delphia E.TRIPLETT. No. 7960.Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. March 19, 1928.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed LOUISIANA OIL REFINING CORPORATION v. TRIPLETT, 25 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1928). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

LOUISIANA OIL REFINING CORPORATION v. TRIPLETT,25 F.2d 1020(8th Cir. 1928)

LOUISIANA OIL REFINING CORPORATION, Plaintiff in Error, v. Delphia E.

TRIPLETT.

No. 7960.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

March 19, 1928.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Arkansas.

T.J. Gaughan, J.T. Sifford, J.E. Gaughan, and E.E. Godwin, all of Camden, Ark., for plaintiff in error.

Huey P. Long, of Shreveport, La., for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Writ of error dismissed, with costs, per stipulation of parties.