Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

City of Fort Lauderdale v. Joseph Moorhead, James Moorhead, George Burrows and Benjamin Clark

248 F.2d 544

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1957-11-01
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The claimed procedural errors we find too unsubstantial to warrant discussion. The findings of fact are full and complete and the conclusions of law are amply supported by the authorities cited. We agree with the learned district court. The judgment, 152 F.Supp. 181, is therefore Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed City of Fort Lauderdale v. Joseph Moorhead, James Moorhead, George Burrows and Benjamin Clark. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
7 opinions
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE v. MOORHEAD,248 F.2d 544(5th Cir. 1957)
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, Appellant, v. Joseph MOORHEAD, James Moorhead,
George Burrows and Benjamin Clark, Appellees.
No. 16615.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 1, 1957.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Emett C. Choate, Judge.
Julian E. Ross, City Atty., Donald H. Norman, Asst. City Atty., Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for appellant.

G.E. Graves, Jr., Edwin L. Davis, Miami, Fla., for appellees.
Before RIVES, TUTTLE and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The claimed procedural errors we find too unsubstantial to warrant discussion. The findings of fact are full and complete and the conclusions of law are amply supported by the authorities cited. We agree with the learned district court. The judgment,152 F. Supp. 131, is therefore
Affirmed.Page 545
Page 713