Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Las Palmas Food Co. v. Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co.

245 F.2d 874

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1957-07-29
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. All of the points relied upon for reversal on this appeal were ably considered and disposed of by the trial judge in his opinion reported at D.C., 146 F.Supp. 594. We adopt it as our own. For the reasons therein stated, the judgment is Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Las Palmas Food Co. v. Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
LAS PALMAS FOOD CO. v. RAMIREZ FERAUD CHILI,245 F.2d 874(9th Cir. 1957)
LAS PALMAS FOOD COMPANY, Inc., a Corporation; Pablo Baca Gavaldon and
Ralph Worthington, Appellants, v. RAMIREZ FERAUD CHILI CO., a
Co-Partnership Composed of Frank Feraud and E.C. Feraud, Appellees.
No. 15306.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 29, 1957.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; William C. Mathes, Judge.
Mason Howard, C. Loy Mason and Paul P. Selvin, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Harris, Kiech, Foster Harris, Warren L. Kern and Walton Eugene Tinsley, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before LEMMON, CHAMBERS, and BARNES, Circuit Judges.Page 875
PER CURIAM.
All of the points relied upon for reversal on this appeal were ably considered and disposed of by the trial judge in his opinion reported at D.C.,146 F. Supp. 594. We adopt it as our own. For the reasons therein stated, the judgment is

Affirmed.