Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company

241 F.2d 416

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1956-12-19
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellant, the court havi mission to counsel for mit its case on the brief being duly advised, ing granted per-appellee to sub-f; and the court Now, therefore, it is o rdered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and i£ hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil, sustaining appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. 148 F.Supp. 529.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

RINGHISER v. CHESAPEAKE OHIO RAILWAY CO.,241 F.2d 416(6th Cir. 1956)

Boyd R. RINGHISER, Appellant, v. The CHESAPEAKE OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 12898.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

December 19, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio; Lester L. Cecil, Judge.

Alex S. Dombey, William A. Richards, C. Richard Grieser, Columbus, Ohio, for appellant.

Wilson Rector, Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellant, the court having granted permission to counsel for appellee to submit its case on the brief; and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil, sustaining appellee's motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict.148 F. Supp. 529.Page 459