Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Co.

United States v. R. F. Ball Constr. Co., 239 F.2d 384 (5th Cir. 1956)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1956-12-26
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The facts of this case are well recited and the controlling principles of law are well stated in the opinion of Judge Rice, R. F. Ball Construction Company v. Jacobs, D.C., 140 F.Supp. 60.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 8 opinions

UNITED STATES v. BALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,239 F.2d 384(5th Cir. 1956)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. R.F. BALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,

Inc., and United Pacific Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 16276.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 26, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Ben H. Rice, Jr., Judge.

A.F. Prescott, George F. Lynch, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Russell B. Wine, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex.

Elmer J. Kelsey, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., John N. Stull, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Harman Parrott, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellant.

Richard U. Simon, Ft. Worth, Tex., Josh H. Groce, San Antonio, Tex., Eskridge, Groce Hebdon, San Antonio, Tex., of counsel, for appellee.

Before CAMERON, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The facts of this case are well recited and the controlling principles of law are well stated in the opinion of Judge Rice, R.F. Ball Construction Company v. Jacobs, D.C.,140 F. Supp. 60. For the reasons there set-forth the judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.Page 412