Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

John Federika v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

237 F.2d 916

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1956-10-17
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel, and the court being duly advised, Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decision herein reviewed be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of the Tax Court.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed John Federika v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
2 opinions
FEDERIKA v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,237 F.2d 916(6th Cir. 1956)
John FEDERIKA et al., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent.
No. 12755.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
October 17, 1956.
Petition to review decision of the Tax Court.
John Driskill, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioners.

Charles K. Rice, John Potts Barnes, Rollin H. Transue, Lee A. Jackson, I. Henry Kutz and Davis W. Morton, Jr., Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before McALLISTER, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decision herein reviewed be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of the Tax Court.Page 917