Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

M. A. Tilbury, Doing Business as Tilbury's Southern Meat Company v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor

M. A. Tilbury, Doing Bus. as Tilbury's S. Meat Co. v. James P. Mitchell, Sec’y of Labor, United States Dep’t of Labor, 220 F.2d 757 (5th Cir. 1955)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1955-05-10
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. For the reasons stated by Judge Daw-kins, Jr., in his opinion in these cases, and upon the authorities therein cited, the judgments appealed from are affirmed. These cases were by consent consolidated for trial in the court below with separate judgments to be en *758 tered in each case, which was done. The opinion of Judge Dawkins is reported in D.C., 123 F.Supp., pages 109-115. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed M. A. Tilbury, Doing Business as Tilbury's Southern Meat Company v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
28 opinions
TILBURY v. MITCHELL,220 F.2d 757(5th Cir. 1955)
M.A. TILBURY, doing business as Tilbury's Southern Meat Company,
Appellant, v. James P. MITCHELL, Secretary of Labor, United States
Department of Labor, et al., Appellees.
No. 15409.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 21, 1955.
Rehearing Denied May 10, 1955.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; Benjamin C. Dawkins, Jr., Judge.
Robert G. Chandler, Shreveport, La., for appellant.

Morton J. Marks, Atty. Dept. of Labor, Bessie Margolin, Asst. Sol., Washington, D.C., Earl Street, Regional Atty., Dallas, Tex., Frederick J. Stewart, Shreveport, La., Stuart Rothman, Sol., Washington, D.C., for appellees.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated by Judge Dawkins, Jr., in his opinion in these cases, and upon the authorities therein cited, the judgments appealed from are affirmed. These cases were by consent consolidated for trial in the court below with separate judgments to be enteredPage 758in each case, which was done. The opinion of Judge Dawkins is reported in D.C., 123 F. Supp., pages 109-115.

Affirmed.Page 790