Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Harriman

United States v. Harriman, 219 F.2d 918 (2d Cir. 1955)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1955-02-28
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed. United States v. Shelley, 2 Cir., 218 F.2d 157.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Harriman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

UNITED STATES v. HARRIMAN,219 F.2d 918(2nd Cir. 1955)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ben R. HARRIMAN, Jerry

Siner and Frank Louis DeRosa, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 188, Docket 23338.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued February 11, 1955.

Decided February 28, 1955.

Clement J. Hallinan, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (J. Edward Lumbard, U.S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Louis Bender, New York City (Daniel J. Riesner, Julian Jawitz, and Richard I. Donner, New York City, for defendant-appellant Ben R. Harriman; Martin Klein, New York City, for defendant-appellant Jerry Siner; and Bernard R. Selkowe, New York City, for defendant-appellant Frank Louis DeRosa), for defendants-appellants.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, HINCKS, Circuit Judge, and SMITH, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed. United States v. Shelley, 2 Cir.,218 F.2d 157.Page 919