Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

The G. & P. Amusement Company v. Regent Theater Company

216 F.2d 749

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1954-11-16
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The District Court dismissed the amended and supplemental complaint of appellant and entered judgment for appellees in this action for treble damages brought by appellant against the appellee motion picture distributors and exhibitors for alleged violation of sections 1, 2 and 7 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., and sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§15 and 26. We have thoughtfully considered the arguments advanced, the record in the case, the comprehensive and logically reasoned opinion of District Judge Freed, 107 F.Supp. 453, together with his eighty-seven findings of fact, which are supported by substantial evidence and certainly are not clearly erroneous, and his seven conclusions of law, sustained by highest authority. Upon the *750 basis of his opinion, findings and conelusions, we are of opinion that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed, and that no worthwhile contribution would be made by this court by attempting to re-write in our own words the excellent opinion of the District Judge, who gave most conscientious study to the problems presented and has stated accurate conclusions, The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed The G. & P. Amusement Company v. Regent Theater Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions
G. P. AMUSEMENT CO. v. REGENT THEATER CO.,216 F.2d 749(6th Cir. 1954)
The G. P. AMUSEMENT COMPANY, Appellant, v. REGENT THEATER COMPANY, et
al., Appellees.
No. 12068.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
November 16, 1954.
Samuel T. Gaines, Cleveland, Ohio (Bennett Yanowitz, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellants.

Luther Day and Jerome N. Curtis, Cleveland, Ohio (Charles R. Berne, Jordan C. Band, Thomas M. Harman, George H. Rudolph, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellees.
Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The District Court dismissed the amended and supplemental complaint of appellant and entered judgment for appellees in this action for treble damages brought by appellant against the appellee motion picture distributors and exhibitors for alleged violation of sections 1, 2 and 7 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act,15 U.S.C.A. § 1et seq., and sections4and16of the Clayton Act,15 U.S.C.A. §§ 15and26.

We have thoughtfully considered the arguments advanced, the record in the case, the comprehensive and logically reasoned opinion of District Judge Freed,107 F. Supp. 453, together with his eighty-seven findings of fact, which are supported by substantial evidence and certainly are not clearly erroneous, and his seven conclusions of law, sustained by highest authority. Upon thePage 750basis of his opinion, findings and conclusions, we are of opinion that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed, and that no worthwhile contribution would be made by this court by attempting to re-write in our own words the excellent opinion of the District Judge, who gave most conscientious study to the problems presented and has stated accurate conclusions.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.Page 954