Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. C. W. Vollmer & Company, Inc.

James P. Mitchell, Sec’y of Labor, United States Dep’t of Labor v. C. W. Vollmer & Co., 214 F.2d 132 (5th Cir. 1954)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1954-06-30
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. We find ourselves in agreement with the views expressed by the learned district judge and approve his opinion reported in 113 F.Supp. 235 et seq. See also the later opinion of this Court in Van Klaveren v. Killian-House Co., 5 Cir., 210 F.2d 510, and Billeaudeau v. Temple Associates, Inc., Ms., decided June 5, Cir., 213 F.2d 707.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. C. W. Vollmer & Company, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MITCHELL v. VOLLMER COMPANY,214 F.2d 132(5th Cir. 1954)

James P. MITCHELL, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor,

Appellant, v. C.W. VOLLMER COMPANY, Inc., Appellee.

No. 14749.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 30, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; J. Skelly Wright, Judge.

Sylvin S. Ellison, Washington, D.C., Earl Street, Regional Attys. Dept. of Labor, Dallas, Tex., Stuart Rothman, Sol., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., Bessie Margolin, Chief of Appellate Lit., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Robert E. Leake, Jr., Deutsch, Kerrigan Stiles, New Orleans, La., for appellee.

Before STRUM and RIVES, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

We find ourselves in agreement with the views expressed by the learned district judge and approve his opinion reported in113 F. Supp. 235et seq. See also the later opinion of this Court in Van Klaveren v. Killian-House Co., 5 Cir.,210 F.2d 510, and Billeaudeau v. Temple Associates, Inc., Ms., decided June 5, Cir.,213 F.2d 707. The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.Page 185