Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
United States v. Michael P. Acri, Dollar Savings & Trust Co., and Edward Oravitz, Administrator of the Estate of John Oravec, A.K.A. Oravitz, Deceased
209 F.2d 258
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1953-12-17
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised, Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed in accordance with the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court, 109 F.Supp. 943.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Michael P. Acri, Dollar Savings & Trust Co., and Edward Oravitz, Administrator of the Estate of John Oravec, A.K.A. Oravitz, Deceased. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
UNITED STATES v. ACRI,209 F.2d 258(6th Cir. 1953)
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Michael P. ACRI, Dollar Savings
Trust Co., and Edward Oravitz, Administrator of the Estate of John Oravec,
a.k.a. Oravitz, Deceased, Appellees.
No. 11864.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
December 17, 1953.
Francis B. Kavanagh, Cleveland, Ohio, John A. Willo, Youngstown, Ohio, for appellees.
Before ALLEN, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed in accordance with the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court,109 F. Supp. 943.