Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

William Kelly v. General Electric Company

204 F.2d 692

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1953-06-24
Topic
bankruptcy

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant in a suit by the plaintiff, an injured employee, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. The sole question in the case is whether the district court erred in holding that the defendant is not a common carrier by railroad within the meaning of that Act and entering summary judgment accordingly. We find ourselves in complete agreement with the views expressed in the able and comprehensive opinion filed by Judge Clary in the district court, 110 F.Supp. 4, to which we need add nothing. The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed William Kelly v. General Electric Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
4 opinions
KELLY v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,204 F.2d 692(3rd Cir. 1953)
William KELLY, Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
No. 11037.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued June 19, 1953.
Decided June 24, 1953.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Thomas J. Clary, Judge.
Charles A. Lord, Philadelphia, Pa. (Richter, Lord Farage, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Charles J. Biddle, Philadelphia, Pa. (Francis Hopkinson, Drinker Biddle Reath, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant in a suit by the plaintiff, an injured employee, under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. The sole question in the case is whether the district court erred in holding that the defendant is not a common carrier by railroad within the meaning of that Act and entering summary judgment accordingly. We find ourselves in complete agreement with the views expressed in the able and comprehensive opinion filed by Judge Clary in the district court,110 F. Supp. 4, to which we need add nothing.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.