Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Dobkin v. Commissioner

192 F.2d 392

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1951-11-29
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on opinion of Arundell, J., 15 T.C. 31.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dobkin v. Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

DOBKIN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,192 F.2d 392(2nd Cir. 1951)

Isidor DOBKIN, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent.

No. 46, Docket 21918.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued November 14, 1951.

Decided November 29, 1951.

From an order of the Tax Court of the United States sustaining the Commissioner's determination of an income tax deficiency for the year 1945, the petitioner, Isidor Dobkin, appeals.

Jacob Rabkin and Mark H. Johnson, New York City, Jacob Rabkin, New York City, of counsel, for Isidor Dobkin, petitioner.

Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, A.F. Prescott and Louise Foster, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on opinion of Arundell, J.,15 T.C. 31.