Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Bohannon v. United States

185 F.2d 678

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1951-01-02
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on opinion of Leibell, J., 92 F.Supp. 700.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bohannon v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

BOHANNON v. UNITED STATES,185 F.2d 678(2nd Cir. 1951)

William T. BOHANNON, an Infant, by his guardian ad litem, O. Raymond

Basile, Libellant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 99, Docket 21811.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued December 12, 1950.

Decided January 2, 1951.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

From a decree in a suit in admiralty brought by libellant, William T. Bohannon, an infant, by his guardianad litem,O. Raymond Basile, against the United States for damages sustained by the said William T. Bohannon while a crew member on respondent's ship, the libellant appeals.

George J. Engelman, New York City, for libellant-appellant.

Irving H. Saypol, U.S. Atty., New York City, Joseph M. Brush and Edward C. Kalaidjian, all of New York City, Barry, Wainwright, Thacher Symmers, of counsel, for respondent-appellee.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on opinion of Leibell, J.,92 F. Supp. 700.