Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Frank Nick v. John B. Dunlap, Acting Collector of Internal Revenue

Frank Nick v. John B. Dunlap, Acting Collector of Internal Revenue, 185 F.2d 674 (5th Cir. 1950)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1950-12-21
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Despite the vigorous contentions of appellant to the contrary, we are in no doubt that the decision of Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co., 338 U.S. 561, 70 S.Ct. 386, is controlling in this case. The judgment is Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Frank Nick v. John B. Dunlap, Acting Collector of Internal Revenue. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
15 opinions
NICK v. DUNLAP,185 F.2d 674(5th Cir. 1950)
Frank NICK v. John B. DUNLAP, Acting Collector of Internal Revenue.
No. 13385.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
December 21, 1950.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Wm. H. Atwell, Judge.
J. Edwin Fleming, S.L. Mayo, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.

Carlton Fox, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Frank B. Potter, U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., O. Morris Harrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., for appellee.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Despite the vigorous contentions of appellant to the contrary, we are in no doubt that the decision of Manning v. Seeley Tube Box Co.,338 U.S. 561,70 S.Ct. 386, is controlling in this case. The judgment is

Affirmed.Page 677