Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Daniel Hamm Drayage Co.

185 F.2d 1020

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1951-01-22
Topic
labor-and-employment

PER CURIAM. It is considered 'by the Court, and so ordered, that the petition to enforce the order of the Board be, and the same hereby is, granted.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed National Labor Relations Board v. Daniel Hamm Drayage Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
NATIONAL LABOR BD. v. DANIEL HAMM DRAYAGE,185 F.2d 1020(5th Cir. 1951)
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DANIEL HAMM DRAYAGE
COMPANY, Inc., Respondent.
No. 13186.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 22, 1951.
Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, sitting at Washington, D.C.
Clarence D. Musser, Atty., Atlanta, Ga., A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

John A. Caddell, Decatur, Ala., for respondent.

John D. Higgins, Birmingham, Ala., amicus curiae, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America.
Before HOLMES, BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
It is considered by the Court, and so ordered, that the petition to enforce the order of the Board be, and the same hereby is, granted.Page 1021