Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
United States v. Carl Emil Ludwig Krepper
181 F.2d 95
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1950-04-20
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. The appellant, Krepper, invoking the provisions of Section 2255 of Title 28, United States Code, the so-called “coram nobis” section, seeks to have the court below vacate judgments of conviction and sentence rendered against him. Krepper’s conviction was upheld in an exhaustive opinion filed in this court. See 159 F.2d 958, certiorari denied 330 U.S. 824, 67 S. Ct. 865, 91 L.Ed. 1275.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Carl Emil Ludwig Krepper. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
UNITED STATES v. KREPPER,181 F.2d 95(3rd Cir. 1950)
UNITED STATES of America v. Carl Emil Ludwig KREPPER, Appellant.
No. 10109.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted March 7, 1950.
Decided April 20, 1950.
Alfred E. Modarelli, Edward V. Ryan, Newark, N.J., for respondent.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and HASTIE, Circuit Judge, and LEDERLE, District Judge.
The grounds upon which Krepper seeks to set aside the judgments do not suggest that he has been denied constitutional rights. We agree with the ruling of the court below that it was unnecessary to conduct a hearing. The order appealed from will be affirmed.