Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Gate-Way, Inc. v. Hillgren

Gate-Way, Inc. v. Hillgren, 181 F.2d 1010 (9th Cir. 1950)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1950-05-24
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, 82 F.Supp. 546, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gate-Way, Inc. v. Hillgren. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
GATE-WAY v. HILLGREN,181 F.2d 1010(9th Cir. 1950)
GATE-WAY, Inc., Appellant, v. Carl HILLGREN and James Hillgren, Appellees.
No. 12399.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 24, 1950.
Rehearing Denied June 26, 1950.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; J.F.T. O'Connor, Judge.
Fred H. Miller, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Hamer H. Jamieson, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion,82 F. Supp. 546, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.Page 1012