Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Wallace E. Evans v. Walter A. Hunter, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas

Wallace E. Evans v. Walter A. Hunter, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kan., 180 F.2d 354 (10th Cir. 1950)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1950-01-04
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Judgment of the District Court affirmed January 6, 1950, on authority of case McMahan v. Hunter, 179 F.2d 661, without prejudice to the filing of a new application for a writ of habeas corpus after having first complied with the requirements of Article of War 53, 10 U.S.C.A. § 1525.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wallace E. Evans v. Walter A. Hunter, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
EVANS v. HUNTER,180 F.2d 354(10th Cir. 1950)
Wallace E. EVANS v. Walter A. HUNTER, Warden, United States Penitentiary,
Leavenworth, Kansas.
No. 4037.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
January 4, 1950.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas.Page 355
Howard F. McCue, Topeka, Kan., and Clyde Vinson, San Angelo, Tex., for appellant.

Lester Luther, United States Attorney, and Malcolm Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Topeka, Kan., and Lt. Col. Reginald C. Miller, Office of the Judge Advocate General, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Before BRATTON, MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of the District Court affirmed January 6, 1950, on authority of case McMahan v. Hunter,179 F.2d 661, without prejudice to the filing of a new application for a writ of habeas corpus after having first complied with the requirements of Article of War 53, 10 U.S.C.A. § 1525.Page 410