Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Hiatt v. Fugate

179 F.2d 679

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1950-02-08
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The order, 86 F.Supp. 22, appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to remand appellee to the custody of appellant and to dismiss the petition. Welchel v. McDonald, S Cir., 176 F.2d 260.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hiatt v. Fugate. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
HIATT v. FUGATE,179 F.2d 679(5th Cir. 1950)
William H. HIATT, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia,
Appellant, v. Russell Green FUGATE, Appellee.
No. 12980.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 8, 1950.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; E. Marvin Underwood, Judge.
Seymour W. Wurfel, Lt. Col., JAGC, 3rd Army, Fort McPherson, Ga., Eugene M. Caffey, Col. JAGC, 3rd. Army, Fort McPherson, Ga., Woodrow W. Atkins, Major, JAGC, 3rd. Army, Fort McPherson, Ga., for appellant. J. Ellis Mundy, U.S. Atty., Harvey H. Tisinger, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and WALLER and BORAH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The order,86 F. Supp. 22, appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to remand appellee to the custody of appellant and to dismiss the petition. Welchel v. McDonald, 5 Cir.,176 F.2d 260.Page 680