Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Estate of Tuckman v. Estate of Cottle

175 F.2d 775

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1949-06-02
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Affirmed June 2, 1949, on authority of Herron v. Miller, 96 Okl. 59, 220 P. 36, without written opinion.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Estate of Tuckman v. Estate of Cottle. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 8 opinions

ESTATE OF TUCKMAN v. ESTATE OF COTTLE,175 F.2d 775(10th Cir. 1949)

ESTATE of Joseph TUCKMAN, Deceased, etc., et al. v. ESTATE of Alonzo

COTTLE, Deceased.

No. 3856.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 2, 1949.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.

Champion, Champion Wallace, Ardmore, Okla. and Smith Pollard, Austin, Tex., for appellants.

Pierce, Rucker, Mock, Tabor Duncan, Oklahoma City, Okla., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed June 2, 1949, on authority of Herron v. Miller,96 Okla. 59,220 P. 36, without written opinion.Page 778