Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

TUDOR v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, 174 F.2d 933 (6th Cir. 1949)

L.P. TUDOR & Harry Kinnard, Appellants, v. TRAVELERS Indem. COMPANY,Appellee., 174 F.2d 933 (6th Cir. 1949)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1949-05-02
Topic: general

TUDOR v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, 174 F.2d 933 (6th Cir. 1949) L.P. TUDOR and Harry Kinnard, Appellants, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY,Appellee. No. 10787.United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed TUDOR v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, 174 F.2d 933 (6th Cir. 1949). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

TUDOR v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY,174 F.2d 933(6th Cir. 1949)

L.P. TUDOR and Harry Kinnard, Appellants, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 10787.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 2, 1949.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, at Lexington; Hiram Church Ford, Judge.

Leer Buckley, Lexington, Ky., for appellants.

Stoll, Keenon Park, Lexington, Ky., for appellee.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and oral arguments of counsel, and it appearing to the court that the sole issue presented to it for review is one of fact; and it further appearing that the findings of fact of the District Court are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment below be and is hereby affirmed upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the District Court.Page 1007