Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

HINES v. EDWARDS, 174 F.2d 670 (D.C. Cir. 1949)

N.C. HINES, Appellant, v. Thomas E. EDWARDS, Appellee., 174 F.2d 670 (D.C. Cir. 1949)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1949-05-19
Topic: general

HINES v. EDWARDS, 174 F.2d 670 (D.C. Cir. 1949) N.C. HINES, Appellant, v. Thomas E.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HINES v. EDWARDS, 174 F.2d 670 (D.C. Cir. 1949). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HINES v. EDWARDS,174 F.2d 670(D.C. Cir. 1949)

N.C. HINES, Appellant, v. Thomas E. EDWARDS, Appellee.

No. 9895.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued April 21, 1949.

Decided May 19, 1949.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia (now the United States District Court for the District of Columbia).

Mr. O.R. McGuire, Washington, D.C., with whom Miss Ivy Lee Buchanan and Mr. Ernest F. Henry, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Nathan M. Brown, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Samuel B. Brown and Benjamin B. Brown, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We find no substantial error in the record. The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.Page 671