Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
WONG YANG SUNG v. CLARK, 174 F.2d 158 (D.C. Cir. 1949)
WONG YANG SUNG, appellant, v. Tom CLARK, Att’y Gen. of the UnitedStates, Watson B. Miller, United States Comm’r of Immigration andNaturalization, appellees., 174 F.2d 158 (D.C. Cir. 1949)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1949-04-04
- Topic
- general
WONG YANG SUNG v. CLARK, 174 F.2d 158 (D.C. Cir. 1949) WONG YANG SUNG, appellant, v. Tom CLARK, Attorney General of the UnitedStates, Watson B. Miller, United States Commissioner of Immigration andNaturalization, appellees.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed WONG YANG SUNG v. CLARK, 174 F.2d 158 (D.C. Cir. 1949). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
WONG YANG SUNG v. CLARK,174 F.2d 158(D.C. Cir. 1949)
WONG YANG SUNG, appellant, v. Tom CLARK, Attorney General of the United
States, Watson B. Miller, United States Commissioner of Immigration and
Naturalization, appellees.
No. 10009.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued February 8, 1949.
Decided April 4, 1949.
Mr. L. Clark Ewing, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty., and Oliver O. Dibble and John D. Lane, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellees.
Messrs. L. Paul Winings, Gen. Counsel, and Robert L. Jefferys, Atty., Immigration and Naturalization Service, both of Washington, D.C., were also on the brief for appellees.
Before EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN and PROCTOR, Circuit Judges.