Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

BONSALL v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, 173 F.2d 223 (3rd Cir. 1949)

Phyllis H. BONSALL v. Pa. R.R. Co., Appellant., 173 F.2d 223 (3d Cir. 1949)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1949-02-25
Topic
general

BONSALL v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, 173 F.2d 223 (3rd Cir. 1949) Phyllis H. BONSALL v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. No. 9671.United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.Argued December 7, 1948.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BONSALL v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, 173 F.2d 223 (3rd Cir. 1949). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BONSALL v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY,173 F.2d 223(3rd Cir. 1949)
Phyllis H. BONSALL v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.
No. 9671.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued December 7, 1948.
Decided February 25, 1949.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; James P. McGranery, Judge.
Philip Price, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Harold P. Dicke and Barnes, Dechert, Price, Smith Clark, all of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Joseph S. Lord, III, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Richter, Lord Farage, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS and O'CONNELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant has endeavored to set up numerous grounds for reversal and has urged each of them vigorously on this court. We have considered them carefully and can find no adequate basis for setting aside the judgment of the court below.

Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed.Page 224