Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Role v. J. Neils Lumber Co.
171 F.2d 706
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1949-01-10
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the authority of Rogers Cartage Co. v. Reynolds, 6 Cir., 166 F.2d 317; Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 58; Atallah v. B.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Role v. J. Neils Lumber Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
ROLE v. J. NEILS LUMBER COMPANY,171 F.2d 706(9th Cir. 1949)
A.G. ROLE, Appellant, v. J. NEILS LUMBER COMPANY, a Corporation, and
United States of America, Appellees.
No. 11924.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
January 10, 1949.
Charles A. Hart, of Portland, Or. (Hart, Spencer, McCulloch Rockwood, of Portland, Or., and Jardine, Chase Stephenson, of Great Falls, Mont., of counsel), for appellee J. Neils Lumber Co.
Tom C. Clark, Atty. Gen. of United States, H.G. Morison, Asst. Atty. Gen., John B. Tansil, U.S. Atty., of Billings, Mont., Enoch E. Ellison, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and Johanna M. D'Amico, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, of Washington, D.C., for appellee United States.
Before MATHEWS, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges.