Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Potter v. Kaiser Co.

171 F.2d 705

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1949-01-10
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the authority of Rogers Cartage Co. v. Reynolds, 6 Cir., 166 F.2d 317; Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 58; Atallah v. B.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Potter v. Kaiser Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

POTTER v. KAISER COMPANY,171 F.2d 705(9th Cir. 1949)

C.T. POTTER et al., Appellants, v. KAISER COMPANY, Inc., a Corporation,

and United States of America, Appellees.

No. 11889.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 10, 1949.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Claude McColloch, Judge.

Green, Landye Peterson and James T. Landye, both of Portland, Or., for appellants.

Gordon Johnson and J. Warren Manuel, both of San Francisco, Cal., and Richard Devers, of Portland, Or. (Thelen, Marrin, Johnson Bridges, of San Francisco, Cal., and Hart, Spencer, McCulloch Rockwood, of Portland, Or., of counsel), for appellee Kaiser Co.

Tom C. Clark, Atty. Gen. of United States, H.G. Morison, Asst. Atty. Gen.,Page 706Henry L. Hess, U.S. Atty., of Portland, Or., Enoch E. Ellison, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and Johanna M. D'Amico, Atty., Dept. of Justice, of Washington, D.C., for appellee United States.

Before MATHEWS, BONE, and ORR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the authority of Rogers Cartage Co. v. Reynolds, 6 Cir.,166 F.2d 317; Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 4 Cir.,168 F.2d 58; Atallah v. B.H. Hubbert Son, 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 993, certiorari denied Cingrigani v. B.H. Hubbert Son, 69 S. Ct. 138; Battaglia v. General Motors Corp., 2 Cir.,169 F.2d 254, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 236; Darr v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 2 Cir.,169 F.2d 262, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 166; Fisch v. General Motors Corp., 6 Cir.,169 F.2d 266, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 405.