Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

MATTER OF JACKSON, 170 F.2d 703 (2nd Cir. 1948)

In The Matter of Application of G. Harry JACKSON for an Ord. Pursuantto the United States Arbritation Act of February 12, 1925, 43 Stat. 886,9 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., confirming an Arb. Award under a Contractoriginally between Smith Bird, Assignor of G. Harry Jackson, andKentucky River Mills, Inc. G. Harry JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v.KENTUCKY RIVER MILLS, Inc., Respondent-Appellee., 170 F.2d 70

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1948-11-24
Topic
general

MATTER OF JACKSON, 170 F.2d 703 (2nd Cir. 1948) In The Matter of the Application of G. Harry JACKSON for an Order Pursuantto the United States Arbritation Act of February 12, 1925, 43 Stat. 886,9 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., confirming an Arbitration Award under a Contractoriginally between Smith Bird, Assignor of G. Harry Jackson, andKentucky River Mills, Inc. G. Harry JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v.KENTUCKY RIVER MILLS, Inc., Respondent-Appellee.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF JACKSON, 170 F.2d 703 (2nd Cir. 1948). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF JACKSON,170 F.2d 703(2nd Cir. 1948)
In The Matter of the Application of G. Harry JACKSON for an Order Pursuant
to the United States Arbritation Act of February 12, 1925, 43 Stat. 886,
9 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., confirming an Arbitration Award under a Contract
originally between Smith Bird, Assignor of G. Harry Jackson, and
Kentucky River Mills, Inc. G. Harry JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v.
KENTUCKY RIVER MILLS, Inc., Respondent-Appellee.
No. 77, Docket 21108.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 24, 1948.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Emmet, Marvin Martin, of New York City (George W. Martin, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

White Case, of New York City (Orison S. Marden and Edgar E. Barton, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before SWAN, CHASE, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed on the opinion below,77 F. Supp. 53.