Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Davis v. Nunley

Davis v. Nunley, 168 F.2d 400 (5th Cir. 1948)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1948-06-08
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Davis v. Nunley. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

DAVIS v. NUNLEY,168 F.2d 400(5th Cir. 1948)

Bryce DAVIS and Phillip Davis, Individually and as Partners Doing Business

Under the Firm Name of Davis Lumber Company, Appellants, v. Jack NUNLEY et

al., Appellees.

No. 12152.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 8, 1948.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Alabama; Clarence Mullins, Judge.

Horace C. Wilkinson, of Birmingham, Ala., and Wm. E. James, of Cullman, Ala., for appellants.

William E. Mitch, of Birmingham, Ala., and James A. Glenn, of Washington, D.C., for appellees.

C. Paul Barker, Regional Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of New Orleans, La., for intervenor.

Before HOLMES, WALLER, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.Page 418