Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Trans-Pacific Corp. v. Goggin

166 F.2d 1021

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1948-03-25
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion (76 F.Supp. 623), the judgments of the District Court are affirmed..

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Trans-Pacific Corp. v. Goggin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

TRANS-PACIFIC CORPORATION v. GOGGIN,166 F.2d 1021(9th Cir. 1948)

TRANS-PACIFIC CORPORATION, a Corporation, Neubart Stamping Manufacturing

Company, a Corporation, Communications Equipment Corporation, a

Corporation, and Columbia Stamping Manufacturing Corporation, a

Corporation, Appellants, v. George T. GOGGIN, Trustee in Bankruptcy,

Appellee.

No. 11734.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 25, 1948.

Rehearing Denied April 20, 1948.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Benjamin Harrison, Judge.

Morris Lavine, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

Frank C. Weller, Thomas S. Tobin, and Russell B. Seymour, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS, BONE, and ORR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion (76 F. Supp. 623), the judgments of the District Court are affirmed.Page 1023